 |
Cicero:
The Life and Times of Rome's Greatest Politician |

featured
in Macworld,
one of the 5
best history sites on the web
|
|
|
Cicero:
The Life and Times of Rome's Greatest Politician
by
Anthony Everitt
|
|
This
is the paperback edition. The hardback
is out of print. |
Book
Description
Book
Description
“All ages of the world have not produced
a greater statesman and philosopher combined.”
—John Adams
He
squared off against Caesar and was friends with
young Brutus. He advised the legendary Pompey
on his somewhat botched transition from military
hero to politician. He lambasted Mark Antony
and was master of the smear campaign, as feared
for his wit as he was for exposing his opponents’
sexual peccadilloes. Brilliant, voluble, cranky,
a genius of political manipulation but also
a true patriot and idealist, Cicero was Rome’s
most feared politician, one of the greatest
lawyers and statesmen of all times. Machiavelli,
Queen Elizabeth, John Adams and Winston Churchill
all studied his example. No man has loomed larger
in the political history of mankind.
In this dynamic and engaging biography, Anthony
Everitt plunges us into the fascinating, scandal-ridden
world of ancient Rome in its most glorious heyday.
Accessible to us through his legendary speeches
but also through an unrivaled collection of
unguarded letters to his close friend Atticus,
Cicero comes to life in these pages as a witty
and cunning political operator.
Cicero leapt onto the public stage at twenty-six,
came of age during Spartacus’ famous revolt
of the gladiators and presided over Roman law
and politics for almost half a century. He foiled
the legendary Catiline conspiracy, advised Pompey,
the victorious general who brought the Middle
East under Roman rule, and fought to mobilize
the Senate against Caesar. He witnessed the
conquest of Gaul, the civil war that followed
and Caesar’s dictatorship and assassination.
Cicero was a legendary defender of freedom and
a model, later, to French and American revolutionaries
who saw themselves as following in his footsteps
in their resistance to tyranny.
Anthony Everitt’s biography paints a caustic
picture of Roman politics—where Senators
were endlessly filibustering legislation, walking
out, rigging the calendar and exposing one another’s
sexual escapades, real or imagined, to discredit
their opponents. This was a time before slander
and libel laws, and the stories—about
dubious pardons, campaign finance scandals,
widespread corruption, buying and rigging votes,
wife-swapping, and so on—make the Lewinsky
affair and the U.S. Congress seem chaste.
Cicero was a wily political operator. As a lawyer,
he knew no equal. Boastful, often incapable
of making up his mind, emotional enough to wander
through the woods weeping when his beloved daughter
died in childbirth, he emerges in these pages
as intensely human, yet he was also the most
eloquent and astute witness to the last days
of Republican Rome.
On
Cicero:
“He
taught us how to think."
—Voltaire
“I
tasted the beauties of language, I breathed
the spirit of freedom, and I imbibed from his
precepts and examples the public and private
sense of a man.”
—Edward Gibbon
“Who
was Cicero: a great speaker or a demagogue?”
—Fidel Castro |
Editorial
Reviews
From
Publishers Weekly
Using Cicero's letters to his good friend
Atticus, among other sources, Everitt
recreates the fascinating world of political
intrigue, sexual decadence and civil unrest
of Republican Rome. Against this backdrop,
he offers a lively chronicle of Cicero's
life. Best known as Rome's finest orator
and rhetorician, Cicero (103 -43 B.C.)
situated himself at the center of Roman
politics. By the time he was 30, Cicero
became a Roman senator, and 10 years later
he was consul. Opposing Julius Caesar
and his attempt to form a new Roman government,
Cicero remained a thorn in Caesar's side
until the emperor's assassination.
Cicero
supported Pompey's attempts during Caesar's
reign to bring Rome back to republicanism.
Along the way, Cicero put down conspiracies,
won acquittal for a man convicted of parricide,
challenged the dictator Sulla with powerful
rhetoric about the decadence of Sulla's
regime and wrote philosophical treatises.
Everitt deftly shows how Cicero used his
oratorical skills to argue circles around
his opponents. More important, Everitt portrays
Cicero as a man born at the wrong time.
While Cicero vainly tried to find better
men to run government and better laws to
keep them in order, Republican Rome was
falling down around him, never to return
to the glory of Cicero's youth. A first-rate
complement to Elizabeth Rawson's Cicero
or T.N. Mitchell's monumental two-volume
biography, Everitt's first book is a brilliant
study that captures Cicero's internal struggles
and insecurities as well as his external
political successes. Maps.
Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information,
Inc. From
Library Journal
Everitt's first book is a good read that
anyone interested in ancient Rome will
enjoy. It is also the first one-volume
life of the Roman leader in 25 years.
To create a work that flowed and was therefore
more colorful for the lay reader, Everitt,
the former secretary-general of the Arts
Council for Great Britain, has taken liberties
when describing a person or a place that
may annoy scholars. Yet reading this book
is an excellent way to understand the
players of the period and the culture
that produced them. Bloody, articulate,
erudite, sexist, slave-owning-Cicero and
his circle were all that, but Everitt
is careful to recognize that the orator
was a product of his age. This is not
strictly a political history; Everitt
scrutinizes Roman society in discussing
events of the orator's life and, when
describing Cicero's marriage, acquaints
the reader with various aspects of that
institution and the home of the era. Throughout,
he is willing to admit when the evidence
for a theory is weak and when he is extrapolating
from the assumptions of scholars. Recommended
for public and undergraduate collections.
Clay Williams, Hunter Coll. Lib., New
York
Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information,
Inc.
From
Booklist
Everitt's masterful biography draws on
Cicero's letters to his friend Atticus
to give a clear picture of the famous
Roman orator, noting both his brilliance
and his faults. A staunch defender of
the Roman Republic, Cicero spent his political
career battling foes such as Julius Caesar
and Mark Antony, whose rise to power spelled
doom for the ailing republic. Cicero followed
the traditional route to power, moving
through the political offices to become
a consul in 63 B.C.E. He also was an advocate
of high repute, boldly defending citizens
who had fallen out of favor with those
in power. During his consulship, Cicero
pursued the seditious Catalina, whose
attempted attacks on the senate were ultimately
halted by Cicero's drastic measures. Cicero's
actions come back to haunt him, however,
when a tribune he testified against has
him banished from Rome. Ever fickle, popular
opinion swings back in Cicero's favor,
and he returns to Rome, but he is forced
to compromise his beliefs to stay in favor
with those in power. Everitt does a superb
job of bringing the last days of the Roman
Republic to life, and he accurately portrays
the tenuous political situation that marked
the times. Most important, he creates
a sympathetic portrait of Cicero, a man
weighed down by the necessity of "moving
with the times." Kristine Huntley
Copyright © American Library Association.
All rights reserved
About
the Author
Robert
D. Kaplan is a correspondent for The Atlantic
Monthly and the bestselling author of
seven previous books on travel and foreign
affairs, translated into many languages,
including Balkan Ghosts, The Arabists,
The Ends of the Earth, and The Coming
Anarchy. He is a senior fellow at the
New America Foundation. He lives with
his wife and son in western Massachusetts. |
|
Excerpt
from First Chapter - copyrighted material
To
understand Cicero's life, which spanned the
first two thirds of the first century bc, it
is necessary to picture the world in which he
lived, and especially the nature of Roman politics.
Rome
in Cicero's day was a complex and sophisticated
city, with up to a million inhabitants, and
much of its pattern of life is recognizably
familiar, even at a distance of two millennia.
There were shopping malls and bars and a lively
cultural scene with theater and sport. Poetry
and literature thrived and new books were much
talked about. Leading actors were household
names. The affluent led a busy social round
of dinner parties and gossip, and they owned
country homes to which they could retreat from
the pressures of urban living. Politics was
conducted with a familiar blend of private affability
and public invective. Speech was free. Everyone
complained about the traffic.
The
little city-state, hardly more than a village
when it was founded (according to tradition)
in 753 bc, gradually annexed the numerous tribes
and statelets in the Italian peninsula and Sicily.
The Romans were tough, aggressive and, to reverse
von Clausewitz, inclined to see politics as
a continuation of war by other means. They came
to dominate the western Mediterranean. First,
they gained a small foothold in the Maghreb,
the province of Africa which covered roughly
the territory of modern Tunisia. From here the
great city of Carthage ruled its empire, until
it was twice defeated by Rome and later razed
to the ground in the second century bc. Spain
was another prize of these wars and was divided
into two provinces, Near Spain and Far Spain.
In what is now Provence, Rome established Transalpine
Gaul (Gallia Transalpina), but the rest of France
was an unconquered and mysterious mélange
of jostling tribes. Northern Italy was not merged
into the home nation but was administered as
a separate province, Italian Gaul (Gallia Cisalpina).
Then
Rome invaded Greece and the kingdoms of Asia
Minor, enfeebled inheritors of the conquests
of Alexander the Great. In the first century
bc, along the eastern seaboard of the Mediterranean,
now named with literal-minded accuracy "our
sea" (Mare Nostrum), Rome directly governed
a chain of territories: Macedonia (which included
Greece), Asia (in western Turkey), Cilicia (in
southern Turkey) and Syria (broadly, today's
Syria and Lebanon). Beyond them, client monarchies
stood as buffers between Rome's possessions
and the unpredictable Parthian Empire, which
lay beyond the River Euphrates. Pharaohs still
ruled Egypt, but their independence was precarious.
This
empire, the largest the western world had so
far seen, was created more through inadvertence
than design and presented Rome with a heavy
and complicated administrative burden. This
was partly because communications were slow
and unreliable. Although a network of well-engineered
roads was constructed, travel was limited to
the speed of a horse. The rich would often travel
by litter or coach, and so proceeded at walking
pace or not much faster. Sailing ships before
the age of the compass tended to hug the coast
and seldom ventured beyond sight of land.
There
being no public postal service, letters (which
were scratched on waxed tablets or written on
pieces of papyrus and sealed) were sent at considerable
cost by messengers. The state employed couriers,
as did commercial enterprises, and the trick
for a private correspondent was to persuade
them, or friendly travelers going in the right
direction, to take his or her post with them
and deliver it.
The
greatest underlying problem facing the Republic,
however, lay at home in its system of governance.
Rome was a state without most of the institutions
needed to run a state. There was no permanent
civil service except for a handful of officials
at the Treasury; when politicians took office
or went to govern a province they had to bring
in their own people to help them conduct business.
The concept of a police force did not exist,
which meant that the public spaces of the capital
city were often hijacked by gangs of hooligans
in the service of one interest or another. Soldiers
in arms were absolutely forbidden to enter Rome,
so all the authorities could do to enforce law
and order was to hire their own ruffians.
|
|
|
|
|